<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Technical Debt on Lee Goldsworthy</title>
    <link>https://leegold.com/tags/technical-debt/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Technical Debt on Lee Goldsworthy</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-au</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://leegold.com/tags/technical-debt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AWS cost optimisation is like servicing a car</title>
      <link>https://leegold.com/posts/aws-bill-like-servicing-car/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 18:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://leegold.com/posts/aws-bill-like-servicing-car/</guid>
      <description>Shovel cash into the furnace that is AWS/Azure. It&amp;rsquo;s fine.&#xA;For a while at least.&#xA;Don&amp;rsquo;t do cost optimisation Link to heading I encourage early stage tech companies to not even think about their AWS/Azure bill until it reaches $10k/y. At that point, it wants a timeboxed 1 hour sanity check, with perhaps a few hours of tightening up unused services, then don&amp;rsquo;t look again until it reaches $20k.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
